- LETTER TO G.COLBRAN FED. LABOR CANDIDATE 02/11/06 (contribution from a reader) -
Sent: Thursday, November 02,
2006 6:09 AM
Subject: letter of introduction and representation
Mr George Colbran
Labor Opposition Candidate
For the Federal Seat of Herbert
Aitkenvale 4814
|
02/11/2006 |
Dear George
By way of introduction, my name is (name deleted) and I am corresponding to
welcome your candidacy to contest the Federal Electorate of Herbert which up
until ten years ago was traditionally a safe Labor seat.
I retired in July 2000 and being a person for life and the quality of life, I
became a victim of circumstance by witnessing first-hand a close friend, who
against his will was callously forced to die a protracted death in a
palliative care ward, from spinal cancer. Before his passing, he privately
shared with me, how he confidentially requested of the doctor to assist him
with a quick painless death, in order to hasten a shorter, more merciful path
to the same end and to which the doctor shrugged his shoulders and said
“Speak to the politicians”
I constantly internalize what I have witnessed to-date by suffering
irreversibly ill people in both institutional and at home care, being
systemically discriminated against and in the absence of overdue legislated
options to provide empowerment to the afflicted, these people instead are
being forced to cruelly endure against their will to the very end. As a
devotee for justice, this cruel situation has motivated me to continue ongoing
political representation in support of patient directed dying and the
autonomous right to Choose in end of life decisions which should be
beyond political debate and be every citizens inalienable civil right.
In the event that you are unaware, arising from a past Qld State Labor
Conference, vigorous debate at strong Party grass roots level and with 70% in
favor, resulted in a dichotomized valid State-Federal (VE) Labor Policy and
set-out below is the current Policy wording.
|
|
(1) Labor believes that
Voluntary Euthanasia should be available as a Legal treatment option for a person of sound mind suffering from a terminal Illness, which has diminished the quality of life to the extent that, that person Requests termination of their life (2) Conference resolves to. (A) Adopt a conscious vote on the question of euthanasia consistent with the decision of the National Executive. (B) In the event that a Private Members Bill is introduced on Euthanasia, all members of the Parliamentary Party shall be free to exercise a conscience vote on the Bill. |
Emanating from past and recent
national VE public surveys and with approximately 80% of the population
in support, on balance, it begs the question why this popular supported civil
rights issue has not been elevated onto Labors national Policy platform.
In this human rights conscious era and on a cognitive level, what should be
factored into the equation is the human dignity aspect of “what’s best for the
patient and to listen to what the patient wants” including respect for
confidentially between doctor and patient relationship. Over the past ten
years, Labor with its culture of in-difference and political inflexibility,
for me has gone about as far as it can go and has represented a betrayal of
its supporters which I believe has weakened Labors Federal power base which
has resulted in my allegiance being hard to sustain.
With Australia now a secular society and both major political parties aligning
themselves with religion, for instance;-“Kevin Rudd’s Statement in The
Melbourne Age”, history attests that there should be a separation of powers
between the State and Church, which I have also conveyed in correspondence to
Kim Beazley. On Friday 6th October 2006 a brief report appeared in “The
Melbourne Age” which openly supported this statement. Set out below verbatim
for your perusal and evaluation is the Melbourne Age report in focus which was
directed at the Victorian Brack’s Labor Government accusing it of aligning
itself with theological virtues at the expense of democracy and liberal social
reform.
| Elephant in the room Letters The Age 6th October 2006 “Melaine La’Brooy (Opinion, 3/10) should have asked a second question. Why does the Labor Government have no policies on abortion, gay civil unions, voluntary euthanasia and advanced health care directives? Is it the elephant in the room, the question no one openly discusses. The answer is the minority catholic right in the Bracks Government that threatens to tear the party apart if it so much as seriously discusses such issues. It does not represent Victorians; it does not even represent mainstream Catholics, 72% of whom support legislative change for voluntary euthanasia (2002 Morgan Poll). At least, however, this coming election gives voters a chance to elect minor party members (greens, Democrats, Independents) to the upper house from where private member’s bills on these issues may be introduced and decided on a conscience vote.” Dr Rodney Syme |
With reference to the above,
while all governing systems were founded upon social norms and moral beliefs,
a secular government’s legitimacy and authority is derived from the people,
not from any religious institution. The separation of the two both guarantees
religion the right to exist without government influence and at the same time
insures the integrity of the democratic system by keeping it free from the
influences of religious pressure groups. It is one of the cornerstones of a
strong and functioning democracy.
Embedding Christian values-or the values of any other religion- into the
political process will not solve the many problems facing Australia . As we
are constantly seeing religion misrepresenting enlightenment concerning
majority supported public opinion issues, then Labor needs to adopt a bolder
approach in developing more refreshing and liberating policies.
For your awareness and perusal I will forward copies of two past letters of
political representation to the Opposition Leader Mr Kim Beazley MP. Mr
Beazley’s reply to my first letter carefully made no mention of the VE issue
that was central to my representation and the second letter to date still
remains discourteously unanswered. I will also forward for your interest an
expose of my fathers last two years of his life along with an abridged report
condensed from eleven to four pages for distribution purposes. To assist with
individual political enlightenment, would you please circulate copies of the
abridged report to your Political colleagues to create an awareness of the
forthcoming thought provoking, two part 50 minute each, documentary segments
that are scheduled to be aired on November 23 and 30th at 8.30 PM on SBS,
which should be viewed with interest by all politicians and the community
alike. Following the airing of Monday’s ABC Four Corners Program embracing
Alzheimer’s disease, a letter from an 80 year old , representing a reality
check, was circulated on Wednesday the 1st November which makes for an
interesting read and a copy of which I will also forward for your perusal and
considered circulation.
In taking the liberty to correspond, I am wondering if you have a personal
position on this important social issue and in looking forward to your
co-operation, it is in anticipation that I await a reply at your earliest
convenience as time allows.
To conclude I would like to take this opportunity to wish you all the best of
future success with your candidacy.
Yours sincerely
If you cannot see the menu, click here for an alternate menu